Planning Board Public Hearing

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Judge Welsh Hearing Room, Town Hall

260 Commercial Street, Provincetown, MA 02657

 

Joint meeting with the Conservation Commission.

 

Planning Board Members Present: Howard Burchman, Ellen Battaglini, Joe DeMartino, and Marianne Clements.

 

Staff Present: Maxine Notaro, Permit Coordinator and David Gardner, Assistant Town Manager.

 

Howard Burchman, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.

 

Meeting Agenda

2 Commercial Street Realty Trust: discussion regarding request to divide one parcel of land into nine lots at the property located at 2 Commercial Street, Provincetown, MA.

 

Howard Burchman opened the meeting by stating this was and informational meeting at which time, Ellen Battaglini asked if this was purely informational or is this meeting to reconsider?

 

Howard Burchman assured the board members and the public as well, that this was strictly an informational meeting on the proposal.  The procedural will come later in the meeting.

 

Jay Murphy, Attorney for the applicant said they would like to have the opportunity to show what the proposal will be.

 

Ellen Battaglini explained that two of the Planning Board members had not been informed of the scheduled meeting and wanted to know why the meeting was taking place when the board previously voted to forward it on to the Cape Cod Commission.

 

Cliff Schorer stated he had submitted the ANR to the Planning Board and the Planning Board voted to refer the property/project to the Cape Cod Commission.  The Cape Cod Commission were split in their vote of 6 to 6 with a tie breaker at 7 to 6 to accept as a referral.  He is requesting that the local boards look at his proposal for the property.  It has been overstated with reference to the importance of the existing house.

 

The catalogue of 1959 represents the house as new architecture during that time.  In terms of modernism, the house was over-constructed.  It was constructed as a commercial structure during its day and was considered to be a horrible structure.

 

The intent is to maintain the existing (Murchinson) house and the existing Gatehouse with demolition to the garage structure.  The proposal will be for two-story houses, 4 small structures, 2 larger structures plus the main house.

 

The original property consisted of three lots.  He understands the need to protect the main house, however, the Cape Cod Commission review process can be time consuming and costly.  Therefore, he is willing to put the main house on the National Register of Historic Places, which the former owner was not willing to do.  The structures will be of low impact and will be very green that echo the main structures. 

 

In 1961 the property was on the market and at that time was listed for $350,000 +/- and the taxes were $6,000.00 + during this time.  Over the last 45 years there has been $4,000,000.00 paid in taxes.  The fiduciary duty of the trust is to get the most for the property.  There have been other interested parties, however, they wanted to maximize the property.

 

Cliff Schorer said he was under time constraints to purchase the property and the Cape Cod Commission will hold up that process.  You could end up with a Disney Land Cape Cod that will destroy the site completely.  The larger house will be approximately 6,400 square feet and the smaller houses will be 1,100 square feet and will be nested down into the hill.

 

The site originally had no green space on the site, just dune grass.  Mother nature did not make the property look like it did in its day; it was the property owners that brought other species in.  He is open to suggestions on ground coverings and plantings.

 

There is no flooding on the property because of the pine trees.  There will be a 30’ setback on the lots, the property is out of the A zones (flood zone) and there is not plan on building in elevation 10 or 6.

 

Mr. Schorer did a fly around of the site and presented a slide show including scope and scale of the vista that would not be impacted by the proposed plan.  The main house area has an elevation of 36’ with the highest elevation at 44’ and the lowest at 10’. 

 

Mr. Schorer said he felt as though his legal rights had been trampled and their lacks transparency. He was always available.

 

Eric Dray, Chair of the Historical Commission read a letter into the record (letter attached) and further stated that the primary concern of the Commission related to the Murchinson house itself.

 

Dennis Minsky, Conservation Commission Chair said he did not anticipate a decision being made at this meeting.

 

—Public Statements

Marcene Marcoux said she is a member of the Historic District Commission and they had not been contacted. Also, she was present at the Cape Cod Commission meeting and said the presentation before the Commission was misleading in that there was public input yet there had been none.

 

She felt the local boards, (Planning, Conservation Commission, Historic District Commission and Historical Commission) have the ability to handle this project.  She felt a regional oversight was not needed and therefore, the process has been faulted.  She stated it was now in the hands of the Cape Cod Commission and wishes it was handled on a town level and would like to see the local boards move forward with the clients because it will be a win-win.

 

Cliff Schorer said he understands the goals of the Historic Commission to preserve the house and is willing to put the house on the National and State Registry.

 

Eric Dray said the local regulations have the most. If only placed on the National Register, the applicant can pick away at renovations to the house until such time the National Register accepts it as a historic structure.   A Preservation Restriction over the house is one thing the Cape Cod Commission will impose, even though it is not the goal of the applicant to demolish the house.

 

Clarence Walker asked what the purpose of this meeting was and what could it do because the property is now at the Cape Cod Commission level.  Would the Cape Cod Commission need to rescind their review?

 

Howard Burchman said the goal of the meeting was for informational purposes and for public benefit for people to understand what is and has been going on here.

 

Attorney Murphy stated the project was referred to the Cape Cod Commission for a discretionary referral and was accepted by the Commission. The following would take place:

 

  1. If applicant withdraws the approval not required plan
  2. If the Commission is satisfied on arrangements with the town that protects the interest and concerns that were the subject of the referral
  3. The Conservation Commission and the Planning Board would then work with the applicant, the Planning Board and Conservation Commission would then withdraw their referrals to the Cape Cod Commission.  The applicant then re-files with the local boards.

 

Dennis Minsky said the proposals and intent is good however problematic on promises because there are no specific plans.  The area of concern is the buffer zone and the standing order of conditions that have not been satisfied. There’s the stability of the slope and the denuding. The Conservation Commission would need a specific planting plan with specific locations and species required.

 

Attorney Murphy said the Order of Conditions was placed on hold because of the purchase of the property and Cliff Scherer would satisfy those conditions.  The Conservation Commission is certainly capable of handling the slope and other related issues.  It is not necessary to have it at the Cape Cod Commission level.

 

Cliff Schorer said he is willing to work closely with the boards but wanted them to understand the areas of buildable land.  The areas of concern were taken into consideration in his proposal.  Right now he is just creating the lots, knowing the other areas of concern will need to be addressed.  Four of the lots will require further review.  He is willing to work with the Conservation Commission on a lot-by-lot basis.  He felt the present order of conditions was not unreasonable, however, he is not at a level to deliver everything.

 

Chris Lucy said he did the site clearing of the property and the only materials removed was the overgrown trees and vegetation that had never been there when the property was in pristine condition.  Mrs. Murchinson was considered to be a recluse, was not in any condition to do it herself and she did not want anyone else on the property. This is the reason why the property became so overgrown with invasive species.  He knows over 3,000 square feet of beach grass was planted because he is the one who planted it.  He stated there was no erosion and there was no washing away of anything.  As for the house, it is protected right now through the Cape Cod Commission under 2bii.  It’s already in the regulations.

 

David Hale said the cutting or removable of vegetation was done without permission of the Conservation Commission.  The merits are debatable.

 

Chris Lucy said he was maintaining the landscape that originally existed.  There is no regulation that he is aware of that says when a landscape becomes protected.

 

Rose Kennedy said the buyer and seller have the same intent in mind on preserving and protecting the original house.

 

Howard Burchman said there were currently three structures on the lot, one of which is to be demolished.  He asked if they could address the demolition of the one structure.

 

Cliff Schorer said the structure to be demolished is the garage structure.  It sits within two lots on the line of a land swap, is a non-historical structure of unimportance.  The Gatehouse is an important structure to preserve according to discussions with John Dowd.  There is regulatory process for demolition delay.

 

Joe DeMartino said the project merits approval but the Planning Board needed to slow down the process.  How can there be a compromise because the concern is trust.

 

Cliff Schorer said the town has a tool kit and that tool kit is the regulatory process.  Also, he said he would be willing to sign and put in writing that he will place the house of the National Register.

 

Jack McMahon said his main concern was the order of conditions that had not been satisfied.

 

Lynn Martin said her concern was with lots 3 and 4 and the buffer zone with respect to the proposed dwellings, septic systems, etc.

 

Mr. Schorer said the GIS map is just a generic map that does not depict the accurate buffer.  Once again, there are legislative tools to be applied.

 

Chris Lucy assured everyone that the clearing of the land was done on weekdays only because he did the clearing and he does not work landscaping on the weekends.  He works elsewhere.

 

Cliff Schorer said he would be willing to provide HDC certainties, design review on the rest of the site and, Conservation Commission satisfaction because he does not have an extra year to wait through the Cape Cod Commission process.

 

Jay Murphy said he understands the town boards would want some level of trust.  Agreements would have to be reduced to writing.  The plan would require endorsement by the Planning Board, then filed and recorded.  He would contact Town Counsel to discuss procedure.

 

—Minutes – none.

—Any other business that shall properly come before the board – none.

 

Adjournment 

Motion:  To adjourn the meeting at 8:44 p.m.

Moved:  Marianne Clements                       Second:  Ellen Battaglini                 Vote: 3:0:0

 

 

 Respectfully submitted,

Maxine Notaro

David Gardner