HISTORIC
DISTRICT COMMISSION
Public Meeting
August 9, 2006
Judge Welsh Hearing Room
3:30 p.m.
Members
Present: Polly Burnell, Nathan
Butera, John Dowd, Marcene
Marcoux, Carol Neal, and E. Clothier Tepper.
Members Absent: None
Staff: Doug Taylor and Maxine Notaro.
291 Commercial Street
Approved
a full view slider with replacement windows 2/1 vinyl. Deb Paine presented a vinyl paradigm window
with exterior applied muntins.
27 Pleasant Street - Richard
Salvador
Notice
out for September 13th meeting
291 Commercial Street - Joy
Cummings
Construct
dormer on east side for egress.
Motion: Accept as presented.
Motion: John Dowd Seconded: Carol
Neal Vote: 6-0-0 unanimous
5 Conant Street - Neal
Kimball
Cottage
#1 - west elevation - door moves slightly to right. West elevation windows are slightly narrower. South - remove window grills. John said the changes are minimal and minor
and way up on the hill. Not adding or
detracting in any manner. Neal said he
would like to demolish the cottages and reconstruct per plans dated August 9,
2006.
Motion: Accept the plans dated August 9, 2006
Motion: John Dowd Seconded: Polly
Burnell Vote: unanimous.
2006-58
Submitted
photo of late 1800s/early 1900s showing 1 1/2 story structure. Neal submitted revised plans. Height is 24'8" as opposed to
29'4". Neal said 2 full floors
before roof structure sat on ceiling frame.
They reduced roof by 5' leaving 3' knee wall on 2nd
floor. Height of foundation from grade
will not change.
Clo
said the first design was attractive but this one is even better and is pleased
to see him accommodate his neighbors.
Motion: Accept as presented.
Motion: Clo Tepper Seconded: Marcene
Marcoux Vote: unanimous
207A Bradford Street
Letter
from Doug Taylor saying it can proceed forward or be tabled until other boards
deal with it.
Motion: Table the issue until Town Counsel
determines whether it's a buildable lot.
Motion: Carol Neal Seconded: Polly
Burnell Vote: unanimous.
At
this point Julie Schecter asked, "How do I move this issue to the next
step?"
Carol
said that we've asked the Town Manager for a ruling from the Town Counsel.
Julie
asked could the Commission look at the design of the building and give a
decision until the case is resolved?
Marcene
wants the issue resolved, First, a key issue is the height of the original dune
in contrast to changes made to the dune and what its’ present height now is.
Nathan
said - we could approve a design because it's good for 1 year.
531 Commercial Street
Tami
Acuri, lawyer, presented the case representing Rick & Cheryl Bready. Glen Parker will be the supervisor of the
project once it is underway. Tami -
regarding architecture - quoted Mary Heaton Vorse - "Provincetown is like
an onion - layers upon layers." It
represents New Englanders, Portuguese, and summer folk.
Her
clients are homeowners and summer residents in Provincetown. Ms. Bready has been coming to Town with her
family for many years. She is concerned
and committed to her house and its architectural structure. She and her husband have renovated homes in
other historic district. They are
committed to visual and aesthetic beauty that emphasizes three things:
1.
Clients
didn't purchase the property to make it a McMansion. There will be no increase in mass. They are converting back to a single family home, making it more
aesthetically pleasing, uniform and with better quality of workmanship in the
neighborhood. They are not adding rooms or making it higher than what is there.
2.
She
personally thinks it will be an asset due to the degree of quality
materials. Section 8-1 using highest
and best quality of materials on the market.
Aesthetically and architecturally pleasing to the neighborhood. Tami presented a book to review photos. South elevation is more architecturally
pleasing.
3.
Elements
of concern: Tami said they would want a
secondary door on the west side of the property. Kathy Bishop, the former owner, did state there was originally a
door on the west side of the property.
North
Elevation - John Dowd said the windows are colonial style window. These have smaller panes the earlier they
are. This is a Victorian building we
are dealing with here.
Clo
cited guidelines #2 - specific windows.
He felt that under design elements, we have to focus on the building
that exists.
Tami
said, "Would you not say that it is significantly altered?"
John
- no significantly altered - 19th Century renovation is still
historical
Tami
– The historic survey said it was built in 1900s and the survey lists it as a
Queen Anne. The survey should be a part
of a determination. Original was
colonial style house significantly altered to Victorian.
Clo
- What is there presently as it exists is a historically significant structure.
John
Dowd - Both designs have historical significance to turn
Colonial/Victorian. Could retain
Victorian summer cottage look to trace to later Colonial Revival adds a 3rd
layer.
Tami
said that 418 Commercial was a single family in 1902.
John
said it was built as a Christian Science Church. Tami replied that the maps say it did not become a church until
1929. In 1912 the structure became a
2-story structure, and she asked John: “Are you are going strictly by the
footprint?” Clo said that the Packard
Gallery as it is now is a different structure from that of 531 Commercial
Street. There are no similarities in
the buildings. Tami replied that
similarities exist in the years built and in the area. In 1910 it was a colonial revival building
with 6 over 9 windows. It's similar to
her client's building. - 103 Commercial Street has 6 over 9 windows.
John
replied that 103 Commercial Street was built about 10 years ago. Tami said 6/9 and 9/6 is in good use in
Provincetown. 597 Commercial Street put
on her survey because it was a stylistic similar to 531 Commercial Street. The Packard Gallery is of that stature. John countered by saying that the Packard
Gallery has a very formal high-style building.
Tami said 449 Commercial has 6/6 in front and 9/6 on sides. The 6/9s make the overall style of a uniform
shape and have more of a cottage feel.
John said this style window is not appropriate to the age of the
building. Tami said that 597 Commercial
was built in 1930.
John
said - your client's building was built in a different period. What's wrong with 6/6? Tami said that 1900s have 9/6 and 6/6. The Mayo house was built in 1980. John Dowd said that Ms. Guadazno said the
windows in the Mayo house were replacements.
Tami countered by saying that Ms. Guadazno told her the windows were the
original style. Carol Neal said that
the house under discussion is 531 Commercial.
Replacement windows in bylaw 5A as stated. Tami said the application involves the appropriate style for the
building.
Marcene
said the 6/9 and 9/6 reflect a style in Town.
She does know the building and it has been significantly altered. She’s
not against 6/9. It’s an attempt to use
a window used in Provincetown and she understands the general flow of the
argument - Sees it as part of guideline
that can be interpreted in this way since it seems ambiguous. Glen said the house shown on 449 Commercial
Street - Is it remarkably consistent with 531 Commercial? Clo and Carol said they should be looking at
the specific house in question. Tami
said her client wants a beautiful, uniform, architectural house. John said 449 Commercial Streets has 6/6 and
9/6 on sides. 6/6 on the front are old
and were there as original to the building.
"Why is 6/6 not good enough for the homeowner? It is in the building in other facades. Is 6/6 possible?"
John
then said that his first choice is 2/2 gains historical significance. 6/6 could have been in the house originally
and Victorianized when the tower was added.
Glen said "Don't know what style it originally was but a similar
building is the 449 Commercial Street building and he suggests that his client
accept this as a compromise.
Tami
said the original condition is in altered state. Marcene said a compromise
position as John says is 6/6 and that would be fitting. Carol said her position is replacement
windows. 2/3 windows have gained
significance.
North
Elevation - corner boards deleted and shingle pattern consistent with the
house.
East
Elevation - no bay window - bump out window agreed upon - windows to be A's and
O's.
South
Elevation - waterfront elevations more flexible - guideline as presented.
West
- eliminate under hang
Tami
- The door 8.1 - She has been told that the Commissioners shall consider
similar features in a structure in the surrounding buildings as a whole. John - the comparisons are central doorways
in formal buildings and garage buildings.
473 Commercial St (MacMillan House) is similar to 531 Commercial. 473 Commercial Street was built in
1874. Claire Baisley, the author, would
say we don't know what was there unless we had pictures. Cannot correct history - why reflect
history?
Clo
said this building cannot have exactly what your client wants. John said - our focus is to preserve, not
design. If you try to build in
Nantucket, South End, you have to keep what you have. We will compromise. Clo
said that John was offering suggestions, and there may be design suggestions. But on the west, - the 6 doors, it would be
good if the balcony is removed and refer doorway at 422 Commercial Street.
John
said, "I'd go with 422 Commercial doors - I can live with these choices
but they go against the grain. To make
the doorway consistent with the house, I'd put in such doors. Single door with hood and geared down with
sidelights. Polly said she could
reluctantly agree with that. Tami said
#2 choice would be drawing West elevation. Polly said - I couldn’t approve the
doors just on sketches.
Glen
said - leave the small door as is and the second layer door without balcony.
Tami
- said a concession on the doors - is there a concession on the windows? Clo said a majority of the board speaks to
2/2 windows and doorway of that on 422 Commercial Street.
Tami
said - I have one more question - If she were to make the suggested changes and
buy a cleaner set of plans - doorways on West similar to Commercial St address
and 2 double hungs - and adjusted on bay window double hung 6/6 - would the
board agree? If windows shift from 9/6
to 6/6 - What would the board do?
Clo
- I'd be happy to see elevations. I
won't argue with 6/6.
John
- I'm in favor of 6/6
Carol
- I'm against 6/6
Polly
- I'm against 6/6
Marcene
- I'm in favor of 6/6.
Tami
requested a continuation meeting to the August 23rd meeting.
Motion: Continue the case to the August 23rd,
2006 meeting.
Motion: Marcene Marcoux Seconded: Carol
Neal Vote: unanimous.
Meeting was adjourned at
this point.
Approved by _____________________________ on ____________, 2006.
John Dowd, Chair