Thursday May 13, 2004

6:00 p.m.

 

 

Members Present: Mark Baker, Cynthia Gast, Duane Gregory,

  David McLean and Dan Brown.

Member Absent:          Ken Janson (excused absence)

Health Agent:          Jane Evans Raasch

Health Inspector:          Patricia Pajaron

 

The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p. m.

 

AGENDA

Public Hearing – Amendment to Solid Waste Transfer Station Fees

Proponent – Jane Evans Raasch.  The change in transfer station fees was requested by the local landscapers to address the issue of rising costs.  Any discrepancy in judgement of definitions given here will be decided by the transfer station attendant.

 

Jane Evans Raasch said the reason for the repeat of this hearing is that past numerical errors have been corrected.  The following is the corrected version:

Part VI

Article 5

Solid Waste Fees

Acting under the authority of Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 111, Sections 31 and 31A, the Provincetown Board of Health adopts the following solid waste fees for the use of the Provincetown Transfer Station/Recycling Center:

A.   SOLID WASTE FEES

 

 

4. Commercial Haulers                                                      fees effective 1 July 04

k. Grass, leaves, brush in pick-up     $24.00 per full load      $28.00 per full load

                                                          $12.00 per half load     $14.00 per half load

                                                                                                                                                               

l. Grass, leaves, brush in high-side   $30.00 per full load      $36.00 per full load

   pick-up                                           $15.00 per half load    $18.00 per half load

B. ALL LOADS ARE TO BE CONSIDERED FULL LOADS A half load is delineated from the midpoint of the rear wheel well to either the rear end of the pick up truck or to the front end of the bed. For non-pickup vehicles four 32 gallon barrels or less is considered a half load. Anything over four 32 gallon barrels is considered a full load

 

Cynthia Gast said she feels there shouldn’t be any cost for disposing of grass and leaves.    Gerard Menangas said the Provincetown landfill just doesn’t have the acreage for composting that requires daily turning and equipment, such as a screener, to make this happen has to be rented – therefore a fee must be levied.

Motion:  Duane Gregory made a motion to approve the amendment to the solid waste fees as stated above.  David McLean seconded the motion and it passed 5-0-0.

 

Motion:  Cynthia Gast made a motion to move Suzanne Diaz – out of order – and hear her immediately; Dan Brown seconded the motion and the vote was   5-0-0.

 

New Business

 

Suzanne Diaz - New catering business

Ms. Diaz spoke on her own behalf and said she would welcome any advice and help the Board of Health could give her.

The address for her business is 129 Bradford Street and she will be working out of Baker Joe. Patricia Pajaron, the Health Inspector, inspected the business and said there is a commercial kitchen and Suzanne has completed the required serv-safe course.  The BoH reminded Ms. Diaz of their regulation requiring that detailed records of catering functions be kept for a minimum of 90 days.

Motion:  David McLean made a motion to approve the application for Sweet Memories Catering (with an amendment by Duane Gregory who added that all food prep must be done at Baker Joe/129 Bradford Street and not at home).  Cynthia Gast seconded the motion with the amendment made by Duane Gregory and it passed 5-0-0.

 

Family Market Grand Union of 56 Shankpainter Road - Manager to provide new protocols to address outdated products being sold

This agenda item was postponed until the May 27th meeting.

 

17 Alden Street - Requesting an Administrative Consent Order for Phase II with permission for a “quick fix”

Jane spoke to Schofield Engineering who said that they were not directed by the homeowner to attend this meeting.  Jane attempted to contact the homeowner with no success.  The Health Agent recommended that since none of the required information has been provided, no action be taken on this request.  The Board agreed to pass on this agenda item without prejudice, but should the applicant wish to reapply to the BoH, a new submittal will be required.

 

290D Bradford Street  - Variance Request

Alan Cabral of Felco Engineering presented the case.  The owners wish to upgrade from existing cesspools to a Title 5 septic system requiring five variances to setbacks. 

Jane Evans Raasch recommended that the plan be approved with a 5-bedroom deed restriction.

Motion:  Duane Gregory made a motion to approve with a deed restriction limiting the number of bedrooms on the property to five.  David McLean seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0.

 

6 Law StreetVariance Request

David McLean stepped down as an abutter. Alan Cabral of Felco Engineering presented the case to the BoH. The owners wish to upgrade the existing cesspool to a Title 5 septic system that requires eight variances.  Jane recommended the plan be approved with a 4-bedroom deed restriction.

Motion:  Mark Baker made a motion to approve the installation of the Title 5 with the requested variances including the following conditions:

1.     A deed restriction must be recorded for the existing four bedrooms.

2.     The shed that will be rebuilt atop the leaching field must not be a permanent structure.

Dan Brown seconded the motion and it passed 4-0-0.

 

 

4 Garfield Street – Possible survey and location errors on septic system design plan

Alan Cabral of Felco Engineering defended the plan to many of the abutters who were in attendance.  A mounded Title 5 system has been built on a deeded right-of-way.  When the plan was originally presented to the BoH for variance requests, the deeded right-of-way from property to harbor was not shown on the plan nor mentioned at the meeting. 

 

Some of the abutters showed deeds that contained no actual measurements but all had a caveat which stated “no obstruction shall be built by either party on the walkway.”  Abutters saw the mounded system on their right-of-way and felt it went against their covenant about “no obstruction, etc.” 

 

Our Health Agent went out there with Albert Robinson, Water Superintendent and noted that the plans say that there should be a sleeved water line.  Albert said that he had not been given notice to inspect the sleeving of the water line.  Jane said she did not actually see that the sleeving had been conducted. She saw the need in the future for requiring that the water line be exposed so that it can be verified that the sleeving was done properly.  The owner of 3 Garfield Street said that his water line used to run directly under the new mounded leach area.  According to Alan Cabral the relocation of the water line for 4 Garfield Street included the relocation of the water line for 3 Garfield Street as well.  The owner was not notified that his water line was in any way affected by the relocation of the water line for 4 Garfield Street.   Jane recommended that the water line for 3 Garfield Street should be relocated from its present location so as to maintain the appropriate setback distance from the water line to the leach area.  She suggested that the water line be relocated to enter the property from the meter pit located in front of 5 Garfield Street.  As far as the deeded right of way over the mounded septic system, she felt it was not a BoH issue, but a civil issue.

 

Alan said that when he goes out he expects that the water line has been inspected by the Water Department and the water line is buried and virtually unverifiable at that point.  The contractors claim it’s along the edge of property and according to plan.  Hopefully, continued Alan, relying on the installer, it was properly sleeved and is a moot point.  Returning to the bone of contention, Alan said the mounded part of the system is about 2 feet high and is bounded by four 5” timbers.  All the properties were originally owned by Mr. Vaughn, so maybe the original measurements are inaccurate.

 

Eric Migkus of 6 Garfield showed that his deed clearly stated: “no obstruction shall be built by either party on the walkway.” He further felt that since the Title 5 has been installed and is, in essence, a fait accompli, perhaps ramps on either side would aid in maneuvering over this mounded system with wheel chairs, suitcases, groceries, etc.

 

Mark Baker agreed with the Health Agent and thought that the construction - as it pertains to the walkway – might be more properly under the authority of the Town’s Building Inspector, Warren Alexander. 

 

Motion:  Mark Baker made a motion that the entire water line shown on Felco job # 03031 plan be uncovered and inspected to verify that it was sleeved properly and that the water line for 3 Garfield Street be relocated to maintain proper setback.  Duane Gregory seconded the motion and it was voted 5-0-0.

 

David McLean wants an opinion from Town Counsel on the right of way issue.

 

Motion:  Mark Baker made a motion to instruct the Health Agent to seek the advice of Town Counsel on the easement issue regarding a mounded system being built over an easement that was approved by the BoH without knowledge of the easement. (It was noted that Mr. Vaughn appears amenable to addressing the issue with the legal advice that can be offered.)  Cynthia Gast seconded the motion and it was passed 5-0-0.

 

3 Atlantic AvenueVariance Request

The owners, Arthur Hagopian and James Reardon, said that on February 12th they had an inspection of their septic system and it passed.  They decided to upgrade their septic system for the renovations they are doing on the dwelling. Seven variances are needed for the installation of their septic system.

Jane recommends approval

Motion:  Cynthia Gast made a motion to approve the compliant Title 5 septic plan with 7 variances for 3 Atlantic Avenue with the condition that a 3-bedroom deed restriction be placed on the property; Duane Gregory seconded the motion and it passed 5-0-0.

 

11 Oak DriveAppeal Health Agents decision

Duane Gregory stepped down.  John Reis, dba Golden Hamme,r presented the case along with  John Medeiros, the owner of the property, who wants to do an addition on his residence. The proposed addition triggered an automatic upgrade of the septic system due to its size and expense.  A septic system inspection was conducted showing that there are currently Title 5 components present, but it is not a fully compliant Title 5 septic system.  The BoH files contained no record of a plan for this property.  Jimmy Roderick did an inspection and found 2 pits; the 1st pit flowed into the 2nd pit.

Jane had a feeling that there were probably 2 cesspools originally.  The owner said the system was installed on January 14, 1976 and it wasn’t patched up as a failed system. The house was built in 1976 or ‘78.

Motion:  David McLean made a motion to uphold the health agent’s decision to require an upgrade of the existing septic system to one that complies with current Title 5 standards.  Cynthia seconded the motion and it was approved: 3-0-1 abstention (Dan Brown).

John Reis asked – if the owner decided to go ahead with the addition and the septic upgrade – could construction start before the Title 5 installation was complete?  Jane said she would need a signed contract with a septic engineer for the design of the septic system prior to the issuance of a building permit.  No Certificate of Occupancy for the property would be issued until the proposed and approved septic system was installed and its Certificate of Compliance issued.

 

82 Bradford Street / Crowne PointeRequest for Seating

Since there was no representative from the Crowne Pointe, it was decided to withdraw their application without prejudice.  This means they will have to reapply should they choose to pursue their request.

 

Approval of Minutes for April 22, 2004 and Emergency BoH Hearing of April 28, 2004

 

Motion:  Cynthia Gast made a motion to approve the April 22, 2004 minutes; David McLean seconded the motion and the vote was 3-0-2 abstentions (MB & DB).

 

Motion:  David McLean made a motion to approve the minutes of the emergency meeting held on April 28, 2004.  Cynthia Gast seconded the motion and the vote was 3-0-2 abstentions (MB & DB).

 

Any other business that shall properly come before the Board

 

Dan Brown had a question regarding conference calls  - might they suffice in another instance of an emergency meeting?  He was told that town committees have to hold meetings on Town property, so conference calls are not feasible.

 

Mark Baker told Patricia Pajaron that both Subway and Maria’s appear to still not have outside garbage cans as required by BoH regulations.  It will be the 2nd reminder for Maria’s Cafe.  Patricia said that last year she sent out letters to everyone regarding rules and barrels, etc.  Mark thought that sounded like a good idea to repeat that process again this year, and asked Pat to do this ASAP.

 

David McLean wondered how many outside seats Subway is allowed?  Answer:  10 total – to be shared with the pizza shop.

 

Duane Gregory has issues about Growth Management and has had communication from Cheryl Andrews.  Duane feels that maybe the regs should be fine-tuned. 

 

Health Agent’s and Health Inspector’s Reports

 

Jane Evans Raasch told the BoH that Sandy Hill Lane will be coming in for a new septic system permit.

 

Also Jane gave everyone a heads-up on Paul DeRuyter and his dilemma  - lounge seats vs. theater seats and flow issues.

 

Patricia Pajaron went before BoS on Monday regarding George Bryant’s compound.  The BoS met in Executive Session and the Town is seeking legal recourse to bring the property into compliance with past court rulings. 

 

Pat had one question for the BoH as their regs pertain to Camps & Motel license.  Diane Corbo wants to transfer her apartment from year-round to transient; the flow is there.  The Board’s consensus is that is O.K. to do and they would like Patricia to inform Diane of the approved change.

 

Patricia would also like the next meeting to be a public hearing on nuisance regs.  It was so agreed.

 

5-15 Bradford Street Extension – The  old Moors has a problem with rubbish removal. It was finally removed, but the next time it’ll be a ticket for the property.

 

Board Members’ Statements

There were none.

 

The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted,

                                     

Evelyn Gaudiano

 

Evelyn Rogers Gaudiano

 

Approved by ____________________________on ______________, 2004.

                             Mark Baker