PROVINCETOWN CONSERVATION COMMISSION
October 3, 2006
6:30 P.M.
Members Present: Dieter Groll, Elaine
Anderson, Dennis Minsky and
Lynne Martin.
Members Absent: Paul Tasha and
Robin Evans.
Others Present: Brian Carlson (Health Inspector), Erica Larner (Conservation Agent) and Ellen C. Battaglini
(Recording Secretary).
Co-Chair
Dieter Groll called the meeting to order at 6:43 P.M.
PUBLIC
STATEMENTS:
Carl
Roach, manager of the Cape Tip Moto-Cross Club invited the Commissioners to the
annual meeting and rally of the club at the VFW on Saturday, October 7, 2006.
MINUTES:
August 1, 2006 – Elaine Anderson moved to approve the
language as written, Lynne Martin seconded and it was so voted, 3-0-1 (Dennis
Minsky abstaining).
August 15, 2006 – Elaine Anderson moved to approve the
language as written, Lynne Martin seconded and it was so voted, 3-0-1 (Dennis
Minsky abstaining).
July 18, 2006 – Dennis Minsky moved to approve the language
as written, Lynne Martin seconded and it was so voted, 4-0.
July 18, 2006 – Executive
Session – Dennis Minsky moved to approve
the language as written, Elaine Anderson seconded and it was so voted, 4-0.
February 21, 2006 – A quorum
was not present to approve the minutes.
May 2, 2006 – A quorum was
not present to approve the minutes.
Determination of
Applicability
Application by Provincetown
Conservation Commission for Request for Determination of Applicability under
the Provincetown Wetlands By-Law, Chapter 12 of the Provincetown General
By-Laws, and under the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, §
40. The applicant seeks to harden the
existing walking trail over the old railroad bed at 61 Howland Street, in
Provincetown.
Presentation: Erica
Larner, Provincetown Conservation Agent, appeared to present the application
for the ‘Old Colony Nature Trail Project’. The Town has a grant from Barnstable
County for $9,000.00 for this project. A distance of 1,000 feet is being
hardened. The remainder of the grant may be used for signage in resource areas.
Approval has been granted from the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species
Program of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. The applicant submitted a
protocol for the work to be performed at the site.
Public Comment: There
was a letter from an abutter to the trail who spoke against the project fearing
that the trail will be used for unintended purposes and thus will be
destructive to the area.
Commission Discussion: The Commission questioned Ms. Larner.
Dennis Minsky moved to grant a Negative #3
Determination with the following conditions:
Lynne Martin seconded and it was so voted,
4-0.
Notice of Intent
Application by the Independent
Environmental Consultants, Inc. , representing Snow Realty Trust I, II, Scott
Andonian, Trustee, for a Notice on Intent under the Provincetown Wetlands By-Law,
Chapter 12 of the Provincetown General By-Laws, and under the Massachusetts
Wetlands Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, § 40.
The applicant seeks approval for construction of one single family
dwelling on each lot with appurtenances, and the upgrade of sanitary subsurface
disposal systems on each lot with appurtenances at the property located at 34 and 36 Snow’s Lane, in Provincetown.
Elaine Anderson moved to continue the case
without testimony until the October 17, 2006 hearing, Dennis Minsky seconded and
it was so voted, 4-0.
Notice of Intent
Application by Demetrios Daphnis
for a Notice on Intent under the Provincetown Wetlands By-Law, Chapter 12 of
the Provincetown General By-Laws, and under the Massachusetts Wetlands
Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 131, § 40.
The applicant seeks approval for construction of six new dwelling,
retaining walls and appurtenances at 67
Harry Kemp Way, in Provincetown.
Dennis Minsky moved to continue the case
without testimony until the October 17, 2006 hearing, Dieter Groll seconded and
it was so voted, 4-0.
CORRESPONDENCE:
Erica Larner read a press
release about QBII, an art installation opening on October 8, 2006 at the Shank
Painter Wildlife Sanctuary. The press release described the artists and the
projects they will be presenting.
PROPOSED REGULATIONS:
Conservation Commission Local
Regulations:
ARTICLE 3: Administrative
Review.
The Commission discussed this
Article, which creates the process of Administrative Review. They decided to
add language to the effect that the Commission be copied on any Administrative
Review at the next Public Hearing and that an Administrative Review fee will be
collected at the time of submission.
Public Comment: Christine
Odiaga, of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, inquired
about the establishment of minimal submittal requirements and refundable fees.
Commission Discussion: The Commission discussed this and decided to add “non-refundable” in
front of the word ‘fee’ and minimal requirements should include the property address,
the map and parcel number, a description of the full scope of the work to be
performed and a GIS sketch plan, with which the Conservation Agent will assist
the applicant. Dennis Minsky moved to approve Article 3 as amended, Elaine Anderson
seconded and it was so voted, 4-0.
ARTICLE 4: Vista
Pruning Regulations.
The Commission discussed
herbicides and options for pruning. They decided that options should discussed
on a site specific basis, that 4.5(d) should have language added to read
“Topping is not permitted without express approval to protect tree viability
and nesting habitats” and that 4.8(a) should be amended to include “permitted”
between ‘dripping’ and ‘herbicide’.
Public Comment: Gordon
Peabody spoke of the need to clarify the language of the Article and made
suggestions concerning canopy layers and percentages. He addressed the issue of
nesting birds and other wildlife that are in the interest of the Commission to
protect and also made the suggestion that a time envelope be required. Christine
Odiaga suggested that 4.2 should read the “No work is allowed in the resource
are except as specifically permitted by the Conservation Commission in land
subject to coast storm flowage, coastal banks and riverfront areas.”
Elaine Anderson moved to approve Article 4
as amended, Dennis Minsky seconded and it was so voted, 3-0.
ARTICLE 5: Wetlands
Protection Violations.
The Commission discussed this
Article.
Public Comment: Christine
Odiaga commented the 10.08 CMR has violations that are not listed in the regulations
and the Commission may want to make the regulations consistent with state law.
Bob Fodor inquired about the violations.
Commission Discussion: The Commission decided to add the violations to 5.1.
Dennis Minsky moved to approve Article 5,
Elaine Anderson and it was so voted, 3-0.
ARTICLE 6: Conservation
Land Use.
The Commission discussed adding
language about the collection of plants or live animals to 6.5. They also
discussed hunting in the Clapp’s Pond Resource Area.
Public Comment: Gordon
Peabody suggested that the Commission leave the dialog about hunting open to
the people in town whom it impacts. Christine Odiaga mentioned that the
Commission may want to add cross-bow hunting to 6.4 and that 6.2 should mention
that cigarette butts, pet waste and food waste, such as apple cores, are
considered litter.
Commission Discussion: The Commission decided to amend 6.5 to read: “No hunting, trapping or
collecting of flora or fauna is allowed on Conservation lands. Hunting is not
prohibited in the Clapp’s Pond Resource Area when in accordance with any other
applicable laws.”
Dennis Minsky moved to approve Article 6 as
amended and it was so voted, 3-0.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS:
Dennis Minsky told the
Commission of an incident at the airport where birds on the runway were being
slaughtered by planes landing on the runway. Erica will contact the Carrie
Phillips at the Seashore about the incident.
Christine Odiaga – She passed
out copies of cases reviewed by DEP because of various deficiencies and advised
the Commission on what kind of information they can require of an applicant and
on what basis applications can be denied. She indicated that if the proper
information is not given to the Commission and an application is denied as a
result, the DEP will issue a report in support of the Commission. She also
included a copy of 314 CMR, which gives a list of activities that require an
application to be made to a Conservation Commission.
Elaine Anderson made a motion to go into Executive
Session at 10:00 P.M. for the purpose of discussing pending litigation. Each
Commissioner was polled separately and each voted in the affirmative to go into
Executive Session.
ADJOURNMENT:
Elaine Anderson moved to adjourn at 10:30 P.M. and it
was so voted unanimously.
These minutes were approved by a vote of the Conservation Commission at their meeting on ___________________, 2006.
Respectfully submitted,
Ellen C. Battaglini
Approved by ________________________________ on _____________, 2006
Dieter Groll and Elaine Anderson, Co-Chairs